-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 28
[uss_qualifier] expand OIR implicit sub handling scenario #1026
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[uss_qualifier] expand OIR implicit sub handling scenario #1026
Conversation
873ce18 to
9204ef9
Compare
9204ef9 to
6f57e0d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM modulo comments.
|
|
||
| ### [Create OIR with no subscription test step](./fragments/oir/crud/create_query.md) | ||
|
|
||
| #### [OIR is not attached to an implicit subscription](./fragments/oir/oir_has_expected_subscription.md) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This check is not implemented.
monitoring/uss_qualifier/scenarios/astm/utm/dss/oir_implicit_sub_handling.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
monitoring/uss_qualifier/scenarios/astm/utm/dss/oir_implicit_sub_handling.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
69009c0 to
d74396d
Compare
|
@mickmis to cleanly add the missing checks I extracted existing logic to a fragment, let me know if you'd prefer a separate PR. Otherwise this should be good to merge. |
282f56d to
3bc929b
Compare
3bc929b to
bdb6d90
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
Cover the case where we attach an existing and valid implicit subscription to an OIR that is currently not attached to any subscription.
This covers scenario (2) from interuss/dss#1088